SAC Legislative Bulletin
March 10, 2006
|
SAC Legislative Bulletin
The official legislative newsletter for the School
Administrators Coalition (SAC) which includes
MASA, MAESP, MASSP, MO-CASE, MUSIC, MO K-8, MARE, MSHSAA,
& MAPT
|
|
March 10, 2006 - No. 8 - Copyright
2006
For a complete listing of bill summaries that impact education
go to
http://www.mcsa.org/reference If you can not access this link, simply copy and paste the
above address in your browser.
|
|
URGENT
URGENT
URGENT
HB 1783
Tuition Tax Credits
HB 1783 sponsored by Rep. Carl Bearden,
Speaker Pro Tem in the Missouri House of Representatives, has been
filed and is expected to be heard very soon in the House Special
Committee on Urban Issues (Monday, March 13 at 6:00 p.m.) and
passed on to the full House of Representatives for debate and floor
action. The bill represents a major effort by proponents of
tuition tax credits and/or vouchers to legitimize the policy of
providing public funds for private delivery of education
services.
Because of strong support by many well
funded corporations and a number of influential state
representatives and senators, it will be difficult to keep this
bill from winning approval in both the House of Representatives and
Senate. If passed by both houses, the governor has indicated
he will sign the bill. There are two documents relating to this
issue which are available on our MCSA reference link above:
1) a summary of the bill and 2) talking points to use in lobbying
against the bill.
The Education Roundtable consisting of
eight major education associations including the Missouri School
Boards Association, the Missouri State Teachers Association, the
Missouri National Education Association, the Missouri Association
of Secondary School Principals, the Missouri Association of
Elementary School Principals, the Missouri Federation of Teachers,
the Missouri Parent Teachers Association, and the Missouri
Association of School Administrators has made the defeat of
HB 1783
its top priority for
this legislative session. In order to be successful, the education
community must make a united effort to make our elected state
representatives aware that passage of this bill will represent a
major blow to Missouri public schools. We cannot be
successful without your direct involvement and the involvement of
the public school community and public school advocates throughout
the state.
We need for you to do the following
as soon as possible:
1.
Contact your state representative and talk to him/her about HB
1783. Explain your reasons for opposing the
bill.
2.
Explain the importance of this bill to the entire public education
community and ask him/her to vote "no" on HB 1783.
3.
Categorize the response you get regarding HB 1783 into one of four
categories. Either "yes" or "leaning yes" or "leaning no" or
"no".
4.
Email your response to Penney Rector at penney.rector@mcsa.org or
fax your response to Penney Rector at
573-556-6270.
5.
Please complete the above tasks as soon as possible as our timeline
for action is short.
The name and phone number of your
state representative is provided at the bottom of this
email.
SIXTY-SIX AND TWO-THIRDS
SOLUTION OR DILEMMA
SB 983 sponsored by Sen. Mayer was
heard on Tuesday in the Senate Education Committee. No vote
was taken for the bill. SB 983 is identical to HB 1582 sponsored by Rep. Muschany and includes
the following items:
1.
Starting in fiscal year 2008, each school district is directed to
adopt as a goal the expenditure of at least two-thirds of its
current operational expenditures on classroom
instruction.
2.
Classroom instruction is defined, as previously, by the U. S.
Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences but has
been amended to add "library and media services" and "guidance service".
3. DESE
shall ensure that actual classroom instruction expenditures are
reported in both the districts annual accountability report card
and in the departments "Report of the Public Schools"
publication.
4. The
State Board of Education shall report each January to the General
Assembly and to the governor a list of the school districts that
have met the goal of spending two-thirds of their operational
budget on classroom instruction.
5. The
State Board of Education shall, also, offer analysis regarding the
effectiveness of the goal as well as statistical correlations
regarding each districts educational outcomes and percent of
current operational expenditures used for classroom
instruction.
6. The
governor shall annually publicly recognize those districts meeting
the two-thirds goal for classroom expenditures as "Governors
Students First Districts".
7. Upon
approval of either SB 983 or HB 1582, the approved bill shall be placed on the
statewide ballot in November, 2006 or at a special election to be
called by the governor for that purpose.
SAC believes the following arguments
against either SB 983 or HB
1582 are
most compelling:
1. The
bill still contains a mandate for the public schools with language
that states, "Each school district shall adopt as a goal the
expenditure of at least two-thirds of its current operational
expenditures on classroom instruction." This contrasts with
the proponents argument that the bill has been watered
down.
2. No
positive correlation has been established between meeting the
two-thirds expenditure requirement for instruction and student
performance. In fact, Standard and Poors through their School
Matters research conclude there is no significant correlation
between any percentage spent on instruction and student proficiency
rates.
3. The
legislation can be considered a vote of "no confidence" in the
ability of locally elected school board members to establish the
proper priorities for spending school district revenues.
Thereby, both SB 983 and HB
1582 represent a significant erosion of local control.
At this time, HB 1582 remains in the House
Special Committee on Student Achievement and Finance.
School
administrators are urged to contact both their state representative
and state senator and to ask them to vote "no" on either HB 1582 or
SB 983.
SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE
The Senate Education Committee met on
Tuesday, March 7, 2006, and considered SB 984, sponsored by Sen. Rob
Mayer. SB 983, the "two-thirds bill", would require school
districts to adopt as a goal the expenditure of two-thirds of
current operational expenditures for classroom instruction. A
representative from First Class Education, the originator of the
concept, testified in support of the bill, along with a parent of a
private school student. The entire education community
testified in opposition. For further information, see
separate article.
The Committee went into executive
session and voted SCS SB 736, SCS SB 912 and SCS SB 769 do pass, with SCS SB 769 being voted do pass as a consent
bill. SCS SB 736, sponsored by Sen. Crowell, would clarify
that school districts can offer a class in which the Bible is
taught, subject to school board approval. SCS SB 912, sponsored by
Sen. Goodman, would authorize DESE to establish a Missouri virtual
public school, with details of the program established by DESE
through the rulemaking process. And, SCS SB 769, sponsored by
Sen. Mayer, would authorize specific school districts to make a
one-time transfer from the incidental fund to the capital projects
fund.
HOUSE ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY
EDUCATION COMMITTEE
The House Elementary and Secondary
Education Committee met on Wednesday, March 8, 2006 and considered
the following: HB 1750, sponsored by Rep. Muschany, would change
the timeline during which a school district may be deemed a lapsed
district. If a school district was classified as unaccredited
within the previous five years and subsequently is classified as
provisionally accredited, the district would be subject to
lapse. The bill is designed to stop the "yo-yoing" currently
allowed by statute, whereby a district could repeatedly move
between unaccredited and provisionally accredited
status. HB 1522, sponsored by Rep. Sander, would remove the
prohibition against including specific information on student
diplomas. And, HB 1218, sponsored by Rep. Kraus, would require
school districts to adopt anti-bullying policies containing
specific information. The Committee did not vote any bills
out of committee this week.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
HCS HB 1070, sponsored by Rep.
Johnson, was debated on the floor of the House this week. Two
amendments were adopted, and the bill was ordered perfected and
printed. The bill, as perfected, would redefine the term "blighted
area" by setting forth criteria that must be met to establish
blight; restrict the use of tax increment financing for vacant
land; redefine the term conservation area; require that real
property tax revenues attributable to the residential portion of a
development pass through directly to the affected school districts
unless commission members representing the affected districts agree
to forego the revenue; require a super majority vote to proceed
with a project if the tax increment financing commission makes a
negative recommendation or a percentage of registered voters
request reconsideration of the decision to proceed with the
project; authorize projects within the one hundred year flood plain
in St. Charles County if certain projects within the one hundred
year flood plain in St. Charles County if certain conditions are
fulfilled; and require St. Louis and Kansas City to make a good
faith effort to use minority business enterprises or women business
enterprises to help complete projects when tax increment financing
is used for the project. HS HCS HB 1070 was third read and voted do
pass by the House. The bill will now go to the Senate for
action.
SUMMER SCHOOL PENALTY
SB 644, sponsored by Sen.
Shields, was debated on the Senate floor on Wednesday
evening. The bill would phase out the summer school penalty
as reliance upon the new formula is phased in. The gifted penalty
is not addressed in the bill and would remain as is. The bill
was amended on the Senate floor to allow school districts to
transport students living within one mile of the school without
being subjected to an administrative penalty as is current law when
the districts demonstrate that the students are required to cross a
state highway or county arterial without sidewalks, traffic signals
or a crossing guard, and further amended to allow school districts
to recoup for revenues lost due to decreases in fine
receipts. The bill has been placed on the March 13 Senate calendar for
third reading.
HCS HB 1273 and 1136, sponsored
by Rep. Baker and Rep. Ervin, was voted do pass by the House Rules Committee.
The bill would eliminate the summer school penalty enacted last
session and would modify the gifted penalty for reductions in
gifted enrollment greater than forty percent. The bill would
also require school districts to identify gifted students as
currently required by MSIP standards. The bill will now go to the
floor of the House for debate.
NEW BILLS FILED
School
Administrator Compensation
On Thursday, March 3, Rep. Carl
Bearden, Speaker Pro Tem of the House of Representatives
filed HB
1934 regarding the compensation of school administrators and the
salary of school superintendents.
The bill would 1) require each school
district to annually report by September 1 to DESE the total
compensation package including retirement benefits expressed in
dollars for school administrators including the superintendent, all
assistant superintendents, principals, assistant principals, and
any administrative consultants. These disclosures must be
made separately for each individual administrator and must be made
available throughout the year on DESEs website and on the local
school district website if one is maintained by the district
(and)
2) require each
school district to annually report to DESE for inclusion in the
school report card the total compensation package including
retirement benefits expressed in dollars for the school
superintendent and the highest paid teacher (and)
3) require each
school district to disclose the above information to parents,
community members, the print media and broadcast media, and
legislators.
Obviously, the School Administrators
Coalition (SAC) strongly opposes HB 1934 for a number of reasons which will be
identified in a timely fashion if this bill starts to
move.
Restriction on School Starting Date
During the week of February 27
March 3, two bills were filed which would mandate that any public
school could not open earlier than the Friday prior to the last
Monday in August unless the voters of each school district approve
a ballot question to establish an earlier starting date. The
ballot question can only be established by the submission of a
petition signed by, at least, five percent of the qualified voters
in each school district in the last gubernatorial
election.
HB 1933 was filed by Rep. Carl Bearden
and four co-sponsors. SB 1114 is sponsored by Sen. Jack
Goodman.
The School Administrators Coalition
(SAC) is opposed to both HB 1933 and SB 1114 because both of these bills remove the
authority of locally elected boards of education to determine the
school calendar for their local community.
|
|
According to our records, the following individuals
represent
at least a portion of your school district.
|
|
Senator(s)
Chris Koster (R) Phone: (573) 751-1430
|
Representative(s)
Shannon Cooper (R) Phone: (573) 751-1484
David Pearce (R) Phone: (573) 751-2272
Michael McGhee (R) Phone: (573) 751-1462
|
|
You have received this message as benefit of your
membership
in one of the organizations above. To discontinue this
correspondence contact: bulletin@mcsa.org
|