SAC Legislative Bulletin
March 03, 2006
|
SAC Legislative Bulletin
The official legislative newsletter for the School
Administrators Coalition (SAC) which includes
MASA, MAESP, MASSP, MO-CASE, MUSIC, MO K-8, MARE, MSHSAA,
& MAPT
|
|
March 3, 2006 - No. 7 - Copyright
2006
For a complete listing of bill summaries that impact education
go to
http://www.mcsa.org/reference If you can not access this link, simply copy and paste the
above address in your browser.
|
|
TUITION TAX CREDITS
HB 1783 sponsored by Rep. Bearden would
create the Missouri "Student Success Scholarship" Tax
Credit program and provide a one hundred percent tax credit for
contributions to educational assistance organizations to fund
scholarships for eligible students in the Kansas City, St. Louis
City, and Wellston Public Schools. HB 1783 has been assigned to the
House Special Committee on Urban Issues and is expected to be heard
very soon (either next week or the week following).
Passage of this bill is a top
priority of the House of Representatives and it will take a very
strong lobbying effort by the entire education community to defeat
the bill. Detailed information about the bill and talking
points for lobbying against the bill are included as links to this
bulletin.
We need for you to do the following
as soon as possible:
1.
Contact your state representative and talk to him/her about HB
1783. Explain your reasons for opposing the
bill.
2.
Explain the importance of this bill to the entire public education
community and ask him/her to vote "no" on HB
1783.
3.
Categorize the response you get regarding HB 1783 into one of four
categories. Either "yes" or "leaning yes"
or "leaning no" or "no".
4.
Email your response to Penney Rector at penney.rector@mcsa.org or fax your response to Penney Rector at
573-556-6270.
5.
Please complete the above tasks as soon as possible as our timeline
for action is short.
The name and phone number of your
state representative is provided at the bottom of this
email.
SIXTY-SIX AND TWO-THIRDS
SOLUTION OR DILEMMA
HB 1582 sponsored by Rep. Muschany
remained in the House Special Committee on Student Achievement and
Finance this past week, presumably, because the vote count to pass
the bill out of committee was deadlocked at a four to four
count. The School Administrators Coalition (SAC) is strongly
opposed to HB 1582 for a number of reasons (see SAC Legislative Bulletin No.
5). HB 1582 includes the following items:
1.
Starting in fiscal year 2008, each school district is directed to
adopt as a goal the expenditure of at least two-thirds of its
current operational expenditures on classroom
instruction.
2.
Classroom instruction is defined, as previously, by the U. S.
Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences but has
been amended to add "library and media services" and "guidance
service".
3. DESE
shall ensure that actual classroom instruction expenditures are
reported in both the districts annual accountability report card
and in the departments "Report of the Public Schools"
publication.
4. The
State Board of Education shall report each January to the General
Assembly and to the governor a list of the school districts that
have met the goal of spending two-thirds of their operational
budget on classroom instruction.
5. The
State Board of Education shall, also, offer analysis regarding the
effectiveness of the goal as well as statistical correlations
regarding each districts educational outcomes and percent of
current operational expenditures used for classroom
instruction.
6. The
governor shall annually publicly recognize those districts meeting
the two-thirds goal for classroom expenditures as "Governors
Students First Districts".
7. Upon
approval of either SB 983 or HB 1582, the approved bill shall be placed on the
statewide ballot in November, 2006 or at a special election to be
called by the governor for that purpose.
SAC believes the following arguments
against HB
1582 are
most compelling:
1. The
bill still contains a mandate for the public schools with language
that states, "Each school district shall adopt as a goal the
expenditure of at least two-thirds of its current operational
expenditures on classroom instruction." This contrasts
with the proponents argument that the bill has been watered
down.
2. No
positive correlation has been established between meeting the
two-thirds expenditure requirement for instruction and student
performance. In fact, Standard and Poors through their School
Matters research conclude there is no significant correlation
between any percentage spent on instruction and student proficiency
rates.
3. The
legislation can be considered a vote of "no confidence"
in the ability of locally elected school board members to establish
the proper priorities for spending school district revenues.
Thereby, HB
1582 represents a significant erosion of local control.
The House Special Committee on
Student Achievement and Finance includes the following
members: Rep. Brian Baker, Chair, Rep. Carl Bearden, Rep. Joe
Aull, Rep. Jane Bogetto, Rep. Michael Corcoran, Rep. Scott
Muschany, Rep. Tim Flook, and Rep. Will Kraus. School
administrators are urged to contact their state representative and
to ask him/her to vote "no" on HB 1582.
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT AND FINANCE
The Special Committee on Student
Achievement and Finance met on Wednesday, March 1, and heard three
bills: HB 1511, sponsored by Rep. Lager, HB 1770, sponsored by
Rep. Baker, and HB 1769, also sponsored by Rep. Baker.
HB 1511 would require DESE to establish
standards for early childhood programs receiving Title I or
Missouri Preschool Project funds. Such standards would
include a focus on cognitive, language, physical, social and
emotional development; an assessment of student needs; and would
require highly qualified, certificated teachers to be
employed. The School Administrators Coalition testified for
informational purposes, expressing support for the bill so long as
it does not impact fee based early childhood programs exempted from
the definition of "teacher" by SB 266, sponsored by Sen.
Gibbons last session.
HB 1769 would prohibit registered sex
offenders from entering school and daycare owned property unless
the registered sex offender is the parent of a student and is
dropping off or picking up their child, or the offender provides
notice to the school or daycare center and is escorted by a school
official while on the property.
HB 1770 would prohibit certain sex
offenders from living within one mile of a school or daycare.
This bill would not require current residents to move but would
apply should a registered sex offender move after enactment of the
bill.
In Executive Session, the committee
voted the following bills "do pass":
HB 1511 (early childhood standards
referenced above) was voted "do pass" as a consent
bill.
HCS HB 1180, sponsored by Rep.
Corcoran, was voted "do pass" as a consent
bill. HCS HB 1180 would allow a school district to petition DESE for a
waiver of the financial penalty and allow the school district to
transport children who live less than one mile from the school when
a dangerous condition exists or safety reasons necessitate that the
child be transported.
HB 1770 and HB 1769 (referenced above) were combined and voted
do pass with clarification to insure that only registered sex
offenders would be subject to the provisions of the HB
1769.
SUMMER SCHOOL PENALTY
SB 644, sponsored by Sen.
Shields, would phase out the summer school penalty enacted last
session as reliance upon the new formula is phased in. The
gifted penalty would remain intact as it is not addressed by
SB 644.
The Senate Education Committee voted the bill do pass on February
7, 2006, and the bill is now on the Senate informal calendar
awaiting perfection. The bill may be debated at any time on
the Senate floor. The School Administrators Coalition supports
elimination of the summer school and gifted penalties and
encourages administrators to contact their representatives to
express support. The School Administrators Coalition is strongly in
support of gifted education programs but does not want school
districts to be penalized when gifted student populations fluctuate
through no fault of the school districts.
HB 1273 and HB 1136, sponsored
by Rep. Baker and Rep. Ervin respectively, were heard jointly in
early February by the Special Committee on Student Achievement and
Finance chaired by Rep. Baker. The bills are identical and would
eliminate the summer school penalty enacted last session. Both
bills initially included repeal of the gifted penalty but were
amended at hearing to require school districts to identify gifted
students in accordance with current MSIP requirements and to
reinstate the penalty should gifted participation drop by forty
percent or more. The bills have not yet been placed on the House
calendar for debate on the House floor.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
SCS SB 832 would modify tax increment
financing laws to include, in part: prohibit use of tax
increment financing for projects located in one hundred year flood
plains except river front development projects and projects located
within the incorporated limits of a municipality; prohibit the use
of tax increment financing for certain Greenfield development;
prohibit the use of tax increment financing for development of
previously undeveloped or vacant land when the development will be
predominantly residential; prohibit certain members of the tax
increment finance commission from being employees of the
municipality; and allow for referendum petitions in opposition to
tax increment financing projects in those municipalities that do
not currently possess such authority. SCS SB 832 is on the Senate
informal calendar awaiting debate in the Senate
floor.
HCS HB 1070, sponsored by Rep.
Johnson, would redefine the term "blighted area" by
setting forth criteria that must be met to establish blight;
restrict the use of tax increment financing for vacant land;
redefine the term conservation area; require that real property tax
revenues attributable to the residential portion of a development
pass through directly to the affected school districts unless
commission members representing the affected districts agree to
forego the revenue; require a super majority vote to proceed with a
project if the tax increment financing commission makes a negative
recommendation or a percentage of registered voters request
reconsideration of the decision to proceed with the project; and
authorize projects within the one hundred year flood plain in St.
Charles County if certain conditions are fulfilled.
HCS HB 1070 was
taken up for perfection in the House on March 1 and immediately
laid over. The bill can be taken up for debate at any time in
the House.
SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE
The Senate Education Committee met on
Tuesday, February 28, and considered the following
bills: SB 970, sponsored by Sen. Gross, would adjust the
foundation formula to compensate for decreases in funds received
from fines. Both formula and hold harmless districts would
benefit from the adjustment for the decline in fine
receipts. SB 947, sponsored by Sen. Shields, would establish early
childhood standards for programs receiving Title I or Missouri
Preschool Projects funds. This bill is identical to
HB
1511. SB 834, sponsored by Sen. Nodler, would amend Missouris
special education statutes to comply with amendments enacted with
the reauthorization of the IDEA. And, SB 894, sponsored by Sen. Nodler,
would require school districts with levies below the average levy
of the performance districts to annually certify to DESE that they
are providing an adequate education to students. If these
districts assert that they are not providing an adequate education,
the bill would create a legal presumption that any inadequacy is
due to a lack of sufficient local effort.
The Committee voted the following
bills "do pass" during executive session:
SB 947, sponsored by Sen.
Shields, would require DESE to establish standards for early
childhood programs receiving Title I or Missouri Preschool Project
funds, as referenced above.
SB 834, sponsored by Sen.
Nodler, would amend Missouris special education statutes to comply
with amendments brought about by the reauthorization of the
IDEA.
SCS SB 894, sponsored by Sen.
Nodler, would require "low-levy" school districts to
annually certify that they are providing an adequate education to
students, and any failure to provide an adequate education would be
presumed to be due to a lack of sufficient local effort. The
bill was amended to exclude the special school districts located in
St. Louis County and Pemiscot County.
HOUSE ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY
EDUCATION COMMITTEE
The House Elementary and Secondary
Education Committee met on Wednesday, March 1, and considered three
bills:
HB 1281, sponsored by
Rep. Robb, would alter the fee the state auditor charges to
register bonds. Currently the auditor charges one-tenth of
one percent of the total bond proceeds. The bill would
establish a $50 per hour rate to register bonds. HB 1474, sponsored
by Rep. Chinn, would establish the Founding Documents Protection
Act and provide that no teacher, administrator or school board
member could be prohibited from reading or posting certain
historical documents, statements and verses. HB 1059, sponsored
by Rep. Cunningham, would establish procedures for the evaluation
of credits for students transferring into a Missouri public school
from out of state, from an unaccredited public or private school,
or from the home school setting.
In executive session, the committee
voted HB
1281 (relating to the auditors fee) do pass, and voted HCS HB 1449,
sponsored by Rep. Wright, "do pass" as a consent
bill. HCS HB 1449 would allow retired teachers to return to the school
district to substitute or work part-time without undergoing a
background check, so long as they return to the district within one
year of retirement.
OTHER HEARINGS OF INTEREST
HB 1075, sponsored by Cynthia
Davis, was voted "do pass" by the House Children and
Families Committee. The bill would alter the way in which
school districts can present information relating to contraception
and sexually transmitted diseases. In addition, entities that
provide abortion services could not provide materials, information
or instruction for use in the classroom.
HB 1678, sponsored by Rep.
Rupp, and the companion bill SB 1004, sponsored by Sen. Days, were
heard in the House Children and Families Committee and the Senate
Aging, Families and Mental Health Committee, respectively.
These bills remove a sunset provision from the early childhood
special education First Steps program.
HB 1732, sponsored by Rep.
Fraser, was heard in the House Health Care Policy Committee and
would allow students to self administer physician approved
medications for asthma and anaphylaxis.
|
|
According to our records, the following individuals
represent
at least a portion of your school district.
|
|
Senator(s)
Chris Koster (R) Phone: (573) 751-1430
|
Representative(s)
Shannon Cooper (R) Phone: (573) 751-1484
David Pearce (R) Phone: (573) 751-2272
Michael McGhee (R) Phone: (573) 751-1462
|
|
You have received this message as benefit of your
membership
in one of the organizations above. To discontinue this
correspondence contact: bulletin@mcsa.org
|